nav-left cat-right

WGG, NRDC and NWEC file comments on CAISO straw proposal

Western Grid Group (WGG) filed comments on March 16, 2016 in response to California ISO’s straw proposal for Regional Resource Adequacy (RA).

WGG submits comments on Transmission Access Charge Options Initiative

On November 20, 2015, the Western Grid Group submitted comments on the the issue paper for the Transmission Access Charge Options Initiative proposed by the California ISO.

WGG files comments on WA UTC storage docket

WGG filed comments to Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission's docket UE-151069 - Modeling Energy Storage in Integrated Resource Planning. Comments were filed September 25, 2015. Embedded and PDF.

EIM and Arizona: Op-ed in the Arizona Republic

26 million ways Arizonans benefit from energy market. This op-ed appeared in Arizona Republic on August 17, 2015. Submitted by Carl Zichella and Leisa Brug, the op-ed was a group effort by NRDC, Energy Innovation, Sonoran Institute and WGG supporting AZ's participation in an EIM and regional markets. It calls for TEP, SRP and Western Energy move forward on their own study of the benefits of joining an Energy Imbalance Market.

WGG, WIRAB, NRDC on PEAK’s proposed data sharing policy

WIRAB staff, the Western Grid Group, and representatives of NRDC, submitted joint comments on Peak’s proposed data sharing policy currently out for stakeholder review. Comments were submitted July 24, 2015. View comments here.

WGG Comments to the AZ Corporation Commission on Interconnection

Western Grid Group (WGG) submitted comments to the Arizona Corporation Commission's on its effort to update and adopt rules related to the interconnection of distributed generation facilities. Comments were submitted July 24, 2015. WGG supports Rule 21, Part 1 with its 7 setting specifications. You can read or download comments here.

New paper corrects two widely held perceptions in regulatory community

AMERICA'S POWER PLAN: This paper corrects two widely held notions in the regulatory community: that the utility’s rate of return is the sole value driver for utility shareholders and that rates of return are set at the cost of equity. Neither of these perceptions is correct. Instead, the financial “value engine”—the difference between a utility’s return on investment and its cost of capital—drives shareholder returns. The authors argue that regulators should use this value engine to align utilities’ financial motivations with delivering value to customers and society. They can offer utilities opportunities to earn increased revenues when they provide value-based products and services. June 2015